some people think the universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Essay topics:

some people think the universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Submitted by arami on Wed, 12/12/2018 - 07:18

Recently, the phenomenon of theoretical knowledge and it scorresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the signficance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thotoghly both constructive and consequently postive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical training can be a plus and I will analyze that throghout this essay.
From a general standpoint, teaching courses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that university criculumn, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricablely bound up. According to may own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. thus, beneficial ramifications of both improving learning skills and labratory practices apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, academic training might increase the consequences of online teaching. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is corrleated negatively with vital issues. thus it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of electronic teaching.
To conclud, there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of T5 far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of oral assessment prove the significance of writen assignments, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implication.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-20 yasamin.gharib62 85 view
2019-07-28 maryam2 80 view
2019-02-18 MehdiKhodadadi 88 view
2018-12-12 arami 88 view
2018-11-07 Krishn Patel 85 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ment which discovered current policies. thus, beneficial ramifications of both impro...
^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations of both improving learning skills and labratory practices apparently can b...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...orrleated negatively with vital issues. thus it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...orrleated negatively with vital issues. thus it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, if, may, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80616740088 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32000219317 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713656387665 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2218348624 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129694000402 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397098159129 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339104709123 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641861626286 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268693545851 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.65 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ment which discovered current policies. thus, beneficial ramifications of both impro...
^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations of both improving learning skills and labratory practices apparently can b...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...orrleated negatively with vital issues. thus it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...orrleated negatively with vital issues. thus it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, if, may, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80616740088 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32000219317 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713656387665 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2218348624 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129694000402 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397098159129 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339104709123 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641861626286 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268693545851 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.65 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.