Differences between countries are becoming less evident nowadays. People tend to have the same films, music, bands, TV channels, etc. To what extent do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Nowadays, many hold the view that the similar entertainment among different countries has many advantages. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that this trend is negative. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate and give my own opinion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the same recreation would enlarge social network. On the average, this uniform lifestyle can provide participants with numerous common topics, which will increase the possibility that some of them communicate with each other frequently when they happen to stay together, such as traveling to another country. Furthermore, the same way people entertain could promote cooperation. To be specific, similar entertaining activities may help people from different nations form the same thinking pattern, which can allow workers in cross-border companies to understand one another easily when they engage in group tasks.
On the other hand, nonetheless, same entertaining ways would also impair cultural identity . When people are taking part in the same leisure activities, local entertainment characteristics will disappear soon or later, which may cause a situation where native residents can hardly feel accepted and respected. That is why countries all over the world are trying their best to protect their own recreational culture from vanishing by emphasizing its importance in mass media.
To summarise, there is no doubt that same lifestyle owned by people from different countries would improve social network and promote cooperation. At the same time, nevertheless, sharing a same living way could damage countries’ cultural identity. In the final analyse, therefore, one can only conclude that the advantages of participating in the similar leisure activities outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-21 | Frank Chen | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-21 | Frank Chen | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical health services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 61
- International sporting events make an important contribution to internal peace. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that the similar entertainment...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ways would also impair cultural identity . When people are taking part in the same...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64102564103 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02631117477 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7406294545 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129815883095 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486789229316 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366147154371 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082012127694 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385298002723 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.