In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent decades, owning a gun has become a symbol of status. Nowadays, several people possess guns in many countries. Although, these guns can sometimes act as a safety tool, however, they are also misused a plethora of times. To my mind, the increase in crime rate is directly proportional to possessing a gun. This essay will point out some reasons followed by examples to prove them.
To begin with, there are various government laws which help people to easily own guns especially if they belong to an upper-class family. Because of these laws, people carry guns even to public places take for instance bars, supermarkets, restaurants etc. and therefore, to show their power and status they exhibit their guns to create a fearful atmosphere so that, others will do whatever they want and as being in rage and anger, knowingly or unknowingly finally they get involved in shooting someone. A recent study done by a private Security Provider company showed that almost 40% of shooting took place in public places and the main reason behind those shootings was heated conversation between people over some service to be provided. Hence, this proves that if the general public will not have access to guns, these types of incidents can be avoided.
Secondly, it is intuitively obvious that having a gun is harmful to those who possess as well for others. Although, some people make use of guns owned by them only for security purpose, nevertheless, it can lead to foster a violent behavior in teenagers. Also, there are many cases related to animal butchering, hunting for their skin, flesh, teeth, horns etc. Recent research by Forest Department of Bangalore proved that many deaths or hunting of animals were mainly done by people who possessed their own gun. Thus, this also shows many people misuse the guns owned by them.
To sum up, there are also some genuine cases where guns have saved many people when used for security purpose, however, there is ample evidence that owning a gun is harmful to the society and the inhabitants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-07 | tontan53251@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | azhar46 | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | srini7961 | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | sharanyam | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Madhumuppa | 89 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 73
- Many parents believe that when their children read books for entertainment, they are wasting their time, and that they should read only serious educational books.What is your opinion about this? 84
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 84
- Some people think that rich countries should support poor countries in terms of aid for health care and education. To what extent do you agree. 84
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 775, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rovided. Hence, this proves that if the general public will not have access to guns, these typ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93913043478 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47740471693 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8848196313 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207968437196 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760434824492 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416584486346 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138515476717 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188083750768 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.