In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of using more credit cards in a cashless society and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effect of the using credit cards in a cashless society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the advantages of using credit cards in a cashless society can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the disadvantages of using credit cards in a cashless society might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the role of advantages of using credit cards in a cashless society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | jsrc | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are over crowding the city. do you agree or disagree? 88
- climate change 11
- more information available online so library books useless? 88
- Traveling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
- Working employees have paid leaves 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51459854015 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19582392072 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.284184885 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.363636364 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285258321633 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106014607041 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743500052905 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175463599059 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313832301643 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.