Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last ten years, packed food consumption has increased dramatically. However, despite this growth, I strongly believe people should rely on food produced by farmers as it is considered fresh, cheaper and can contribute to boost the farmer’s wealth.
First, packed food items are not actually that much cheaper than local food items, due to shipping charge added to it. Some people predict ready made food items are easy to cook as it saves time, therefore, cost is not a major concern. While this is accepatale if you need food instantly, I would argue that only rich people can afford branded food items, though majority of population of the country is not rich , hence, local food would be preferred most.
Another factor is freshness. Although it is undeniable that packed food has similar taste like freshly cooked food. This is particularly true due to added flavor and preservatives it is kept artificially healthy. Moreover , for preserving food , special packaging is used which is made up of plastics mainly and hence, has detrimental effect to the environment . Consequently, garbage is produced more. However, local food can be served without special packing and are recently procured with full of required vitamins and minerals.
Finally, if people purchase from local food vendors then the turnover of farmers will increase significantly. Also, the majority of the population of our country constitutes farmer. Thus, it will help to elevate the economy with the more promising quality of the food.
In conclusion, the fact that local food ensures safety to the environment and it is healthier than preserved food means I believe that the consumption of prepared food items should be avoided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | asterr | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | maryam.m.v | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | Joel James | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t ready made food items are easy to cook as it saves time, therefore, cost is not...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of population of the country is not rich , hence, local food would be preferred mo...
^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d most. Another factor is freshness. Although it is undeniable that packed food has s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t is kept artificially healthy. Moreover , for preserving food , special packaging...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... healthy. Moreover , for preserving food , special packaging is used which is made...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as detrimental effect to the environment . Consequently, garbage is produced more....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2238267148 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76711388248 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0762972836 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310292059729 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098047223687 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642103779228 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17428713224 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426635982803 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.