In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative
It is true that the structure of family have totally changed as well as change the contribution of family members. Men and women 's similar duties in every work in modern time, still I think that this trend distribute negative impact in society than benefits. This essay will explain the equal right of female and nuclear family's advantage and another side will reflect the negative effect of this trend , specially in children's life
Duties of male and female have different from pasttime. Firstly, woman handle the home and going to office for doing job which help them complete their daily household need with extra money while men also manage the house work in the absence of wife. For example, every American women do job with husband. Therefore, we can say that changing structure of family increase the dependency of women in the world. Secondly, must of family live in nuclear family, whereas big family rise the responsibility nsibility of husband and wife. Nuclear family give the freedom to offspring who can do that thing which they want suppose joint family do not allow junk food to children while they may eat fast food in nuclear family.
The several worse effect also present in changing parental role, cause of busy schedule parents do not have time for off nurturing their children. So they send their kids in boarding school. Although joint family give better protection and put social value in offspring. Furthermore, love and care only present in joint family who learn the importance of each other, such as number of Indian family like to live in joint family. At the end, we can say that the significant of traditional family role cannot comparison with modern structure.
In the conclusion
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject. What are causes? And what will be effect on society? 73
- It is generally accepted that smoking causes the deaths of large number of people. In order to address this problem governments should bans smoking in public places. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 61
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- e money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eflect the negative effect of this trend , specially in childrens life Duties of ...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fspring. Furthermore, love and care only present in joint family who learn the im...
^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...annot comparison with modern structure. In the conclusion
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, i think, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93771626298 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39402993096 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2943358469 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206566003593 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717668200992 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673006542988 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142850804079 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159268820984 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.