Living in a big city can be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many hold the view that the life in some metropolis is not so good for people’s health. However, at the same time, there is a body of views holding that living in these cities does good to human’s fitness. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that living in big cities basically does harm to people’s mental health. This is because the inhabitant tends to feel lonely, for living in the cities in the cities is easy for them to lose friends frequently due to the high mobility of population in these big cities. Furthermore, living in the city also takes a toll on human’s physical fitness, since numerous factories which continuously emit the toxic gas such as sulfur dioxide are constructed in metropolis.
On the other hand, however, residents who live in the big cities have chances to keep the physically healthy. This is because these big cities are equipped with advanced medical services, which allow the residents to recover from diseases when they are sick. In addition, inhabitants rend to feel relaxed when they live in these metropolis, as these places always provide a variety of entertaining activities as concert halls and cinemas.
To sum up, there is no doubt that living in big cities makes residents feel lonely and is quite easy for them to inhale some toxic gas. At the same time, however, living in these metropolis also allow them to enjoy the advanced medical health and a variety of entertaining activities. In the final analysis, one can safely conclude that living in these big cities is good for people’s health.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- it is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reverse the trend? 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that the life in some metropol...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this metropolis' or 'these metropolises'?
Suggestion: this metropolis; these metropolises
... rend to feel relaxed when they live in these metropolis, as these places always provide a varie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this metropolis' or 'these metropolises'?
Suggestion: this metropolis; these metropolises
...s. At the same time, however, living in these metropolis also allow them to enjoy the advanced m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90714285714 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72283428262 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4406938445 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296170205701 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129119373658 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952561062604 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199278238379 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749841020751 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.