Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the internet than on public transportation.
Nowadays, public transportation and accessing to the internet are very important. On the one hand, heavy traffic that are in crowded cities, especially in the metropolitan areas, means that in order to solve this problem public transportation must be improved. On the other hand, improvement of technologies and knowledge is drastically accelerated, though people need to have an access to this information and utilizing the internet is the best way we can do for that. In my opinion it’s better that government spend more money on improving public transportation than accessing to the internet. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, deficiency in the transportation system leads to traffic. Traffic particularly in metropolitan areas is very disturbing. High traffic leads to wasting time, slowing down the progress of works, increasing the probability of accidents etc. I have even heard that based on last researches, on average everybody spends more than 750 hours in traffic per year. That’s amazing. It means that anyone wastes more than one month of his or her life in traffic per year. These problems can be solved only by improving public transportation network. My own experience demonstrates the influence of public transportation. 3 years ago, when the subway network of city on which I live was not finished, I had to spend one and half hour for getting to my work. Because of this problem I had to woke up earlier in the morning and during the day I was bored and I could not do the best. But since last year on that the subway network has commenced working, I have spent only 30 minutes for getting my work.
In addition, lack of public transportation network leads to lots of environmental and health problems. If everybody wants to use private car, air would be polluted. Pollution of air would arise many diseases and leads to deaths of huge number of people. I’ve read in the newspaper that on the polluted day the average number of heart attacks rise by over 50 percent.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that government should spend more money on improving public transportation rather than accessing to internet. I feel this way because I think saving time, money, environment and health of humans is absolutely important.
- “Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of w 59
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 75
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college. 50
- TPO 54- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...accelerated, though people need to have an access to this information and utilizing the i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. It means that anyone wastes more than one month of his or her life in traffic ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01295336788 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98223439372 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531088082902 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4234814339 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1428571429 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269827260837 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077533324304 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116809918348 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178476326037 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119269031048 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.