Essay topics: The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980
The pie chart gives illustrated imprisonment in fives countries from 1930 to 1980. Overall, it can be seen that, the higher Detentions in US and following by Canada. Dominating database is fluctuated. Despite from Britain had lower in mate but steadily peak.
Starting in Britain 1930 witnessed a gradual rise in the number of nappe around 29 to 83 in 1980. Moved in Australia national between 1940 to 1960 the risuner at a fairly similar level round 45 until 50. Then, New Zealand both 1960 - 1970 resistance remained constant amount of 62. But the last year rose number of 84.
Furthermore, US in 1930 stood at 100 digit and increased moderately total of 130 in 1940. Over following three years, there was fall to 95. although in 1980 reach a though of 135. The last Canada which in 1940 climb of 125 from 100 in 1930. But then, hit a low of 82 in 1970.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 62 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | lapkhanh | view |
- the table below show the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980..Write a report for university lecturer describing the information shown below. 11
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dongerous. to what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 78
- pie chart show female and male fitness membersship between 1970 and 2000. womenmen197010002000197520004000198018002700198528001800199020502000199528005000200020001000 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can be seen that, the higher Detentions in US and following by Canada. Dominatin...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...wing three years, there was fall to 95. although in 1980 reach a though of 135. The last...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52903225806 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49473475788 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703225806452 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4009894067 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 54.0 112.824112599 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.9230769231 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143667027115 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437351784091 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753534403545 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918277479906 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348913869081 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.9 13.2329268293 45% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 94.15 61.2550243902 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.9 10.3012195122 28% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.11 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.