The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005.
The line graph shows the information of female employees in four nations namely the USA, Korea, Afghanistan, and France over the 20 years from 1985 to 2005. Overall, all countries experienced upward trends in the percentage of female workers except for Afghanistan.
Starting from the highest base at around 45%, the figure for employed women in the USA increased gradually to nearly 65% over the first 20 years. Although it witnessed a slight decline of about 5% in the end, it was still generally the highest. Following by French female employees, its figure decreased slightly from 1985 to 1990 from 40% to just above 30% respectively, then it went up to 50% in 2000 and remained unchanged to the end of the period surveyed. The proportion of female employees in Korea was at the lowest peak in 1985, at 20%. During the remaining time, it grew steadily and stood at nearly 40% in 2005.
In terms of Afghanistan, the number of women who were employed was 10% higher than the formers in 1985. However, it saw a sharp decrease since 1995 from 40% to the bottom of just over 0% in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-04 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 84
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker 77
- The chart shows the global water use by sector and water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, still, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66321243523 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55598538537 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60621761658 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9570621198 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303338536252 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104167118578 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919788463561 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201649291565 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665059841736 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.