Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree??
It is true that technological advancement has changed the way people live nowadays, among which the advent of mobile phones is significant. However, some people believe that cellphones has had bad influence of people interaction. From my point, i do not agree with this view.
It is understandable why some people are of the opinion that people have not interacted with each other more often as they did since the invention of cellphones. The key rationale is that using mobile phone reduces face – to – face conversations, people today especially teenagers and young adults are becoming more and more socially isolated. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies the situation. Many teenagers are glued to their cellphones to play games or checking their social account and not engage in conversations, so it is sensible that cellphones, in a certain extent, have negative effects on people relationship.
However, this is not always true. In fact, mobile phones help people to communicate more in a some situations. Students, for example, can keep in touch with their family by cellphones more quickly and conveniently when they study far away from home. It may be more difficult for these students to talk to their parents without cellphones and the limited and out dated means of communication like letters. Moreover, the invention of smart phones with more functions entitles people to connect with more people on social networking site such as Facebook or zalo. Through video call or chatting box, it is so easily for people to communicate with their friends. It could be said that in this case mobile phones actually connect people instead of isolating them.
In conclusion, while it cannot be denied that cell phones somehow make people less interactive, I believe that if people are aware of how to use mobile phone effectively, it will be a great way of communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-07 | linhnganguyen | 78 | view |
- the graph illustrate wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990 73
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often agreed that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 84
- The chart below shows figures for attendances at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017. 73
- Prison is the most common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. however, a more effective solution is to provide peope a better education. Do you agree or disagree?? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e of people interaction. From my point, i do not agree with this view. It is un...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10749185668 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87353654546 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3927697199 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371757324442 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121786538442 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918505007448 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240134762888 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400324207633 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.