pro and con's of uniform currency
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the uniform currency benefited the European countries. while the reading states that European countries are improved their economy with a single form of currency. The lecture, on the other hand, refutes this, saying that the claim is an outdated and optimistic prediction.
First of all, the reading claims because of unforming price, the country currency was stable. However, the lecture argues that although it is right within their regional countries, they don't just trade only with them. She further illustrated that the other nationals had a different currency which has impacts on their trades.
In addition, the reading makes an argument that a single form currency attracts more international trade because of no price fluctuation between the regional countries. The lecture counter this point by stating it makes sense but not noticeable changes. According to the professor, they already had enough trading between their alien countries, so there has been no economic benefit.
Lastly, the reading posits that euro benefit support worker mobility. Because it makes easier to work in the neighboring counties. The lecture contended this claim by point out that migrating to the other country is an immigration issue not depend on the country currency.
- If you were given some financial support to start a business, what business would you start? Use speciific reasosn and examples 76
- impact of smoking on society 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?1）Interrupt and correct t 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- reasons about an asteroid could be the best colonization option 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the uniform currency benefited the Euro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...rency benefited the European countries. while the reading states that European countr...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rency benefited the European countries. while the reading states that European countr...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t within their regional countries, they dont just trade only with them. She further ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t euro benefit support worker mobility. Because it makes easier to work in the neighbor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37198067633 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56758626759 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8457343274 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741260057612 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306403565151 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504241545234 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478241237882 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337412204953 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.