The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995--2002.
The bar chart illustrates the total quantities of minutes(in billions) of three kinds of telephone calls in the UK from 1995 to 2002. Overall, it is clear that the difference between the three sorts of telephone calls was much smaller in 2002 than in 1995, although local-fixed line was still used most frequently.
In 1995, Local—fixed line was the most popular among the three types, with nearly 72 billion minutes used. It was followed by national and international—fixed line, with about 35 billion minutes spent, and mobiles played the smallest role(only about 3 billion minutes).
Over the period of the seven years, the figure for local—fixed line experienced ups and downs/fluctuations, increasing to a peak at 90 billion minutes in 1999 and then falling back to the 1995 data in 2002. However, the number of minutes used in National and international—fixed line showed a gradual/steady increase, reaching approximately 60 billion minutes by 2002. The same trend can also be seen in that in mobiles, but it increased more significantly after 1998, standing at roughly 40 billion minutes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-24 | PRM12 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | Frank Chen | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the followings statement? Teachers’ performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 61
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23463687151 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36783945928 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.161470218 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344205295128 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174319702393 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121820008764 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230740364599 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926805146727 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.