While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Recruiting a person for a new job is a vital element to the human resources department of a company, as they need to see validate personal and professional background so that they can adjust with the company. Some say that recruiting persons should more concentrate more on the personal variables than qualifications and experience. This essay will discuss why recruiting a person with good qualities is entirely necessary than that the person with qualifications and experience.
Recruiters have always been particular about taking qualified and experienced people. Companies are more concern about the level of educations and experience as they have well qualified and good industry exposure to lead the company and apply the experience in creating more pioneering work. Indeed, there are many recorded instances of new employees who have been recruited only on the basis of their qualifications and experience without validating their personal qualities. These instances and reasons are the brief explanations of why the companies are recruiting people with experience and qualifications without giving any weight to qualities if the person
Apart from industrial experience and qualification, there is the main thing that recruiters should see in a person’s professional behavior that is; personal qualifications. Companies need to recruit people with good behavior, punctuality, hardworking and helping nature these are the main things that are required for a person to lead the company or to succeed in a job. Although qualification and experience are important, without good personal qualifications there will be disturbances and discrepancy in the team which leads to degradation of the company. Hence, personal qualification is more important than the professional experience and qualifications
To conclude, it is always a debate between the most qualified and good personality in recruiting. In this essay, I have given some stats and reasons to prefer a good personal profile instead of taking the most qualified person. In my perspective, if the person has good personal qualities he will always be an asset to a company than a person with qualification and experience
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-05 | ndbro17 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-05 | ndbro17 | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | HARANMOL SINGH | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | javaduddupudi | 52 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many famous athletes advertise different products What are the advantages and disadvantages of it 70
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and include relevant examples 52
- Some people think that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences. others may think there are alternatives for this problemdiscuss both vews and give ur opinion 61
- people sleep less than before in many countries why people sleep less what effect does it have individually and in society 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...new job is a vital element to the human resources department of a company, as they need t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ofessional experience and qualifications To conclude, it is always a debate betwe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...person with qualification and experience
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54166666667 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26962936592 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9732015229 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.166666667 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216034104177 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107793868001 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699491934531 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15194009204 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456848289666 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.