the amounts of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years
The line chart illustrates the variation in waste amounts which three companies outputted and how these figures altered during a 15-year period from 2000 to 2015
It is clear that the amounts of waste of company A and B decreased during the period given. By contrast, for company C, a considerable rose could be seen in 2015, with the figures eventually surpassed those for company A. Overall, a much larger amount of waste was produced by company A in comparison with company B and C.
In 2000, around 12 tonnes of waste were made by company A, compared to about 8 tonnes of company B and 3 tonnes of company C. The amount of waste production of company A then dropped by roughly 1 tonne over the next five years in 2005. In contrast, the figures for both company B and C increased steadily, reaching nearly 6 tonnes and 10 tonnes.
In the period between 2005 and 2015, a sudden plummeted of waste amounts was company A and B, while company C still climbed steadily. By 2015, it is thought that around 3 tonnes of waste production were made by company B, whereas the figures for company A and B were much higher, at about 8 tonnes and 10 tonnes approximately
- One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities? 11
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate Discuss the main traffic problem in tour country and possible solution 95
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ching nearly 6 tonnes and 10 tonnes. In the period between 2005 and 2015, a sud...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54028436019 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57649964901 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483412322275 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8071280039 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451382347465 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221297274057 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125773582408 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292108623081 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453338263003 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.