It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
People have diverse opinions regarding what truly is the reason of success: natural talent or hard work and dedication. I am personally of the opinion that guidance and passion are key points of those who succeed in life.
To begin with, in some occasions it is challenging to oppose against the existence of God's gift, when you become a witness of magical performance of certain individual. For instance, some singers have surpassing voice that is easily recognised or there are some athletes that beat unimaginable records, astonishing the whole globe. Getting deeper to their origin, most of them are from poor families and were nurtured in not the best conditions. Moreover, they never had any teaching or any special directing since the youngest ages. Subsequently, it is then believed that their talents are the main thing that raised them to where they are or were in their prime.
On the other hand, the effectiveness of talent can be argued by some specialists, who are obsessed with their favourite activity and fortunate mainly because of their constant practice. Clarifying that, the world's fastest man Usain Bolt would not be himself, if he would bet on only his gift, as it is evident that he trains everyday and stick to the constraint diet. Furthermore, talent is not enough in the key moments, since it can not help to predict the further situations and only visualisation of the future accomplishments may help to get more confident in the abilities of the one. Thus, there are other fundamental things that can bring out the best in every personality.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that some people are extraordinary in some spheres of art or job, but it is very trivial quality compared to others mentioned above in becoming victorious.
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. 84
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 84
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the whole world and indifferent parts of the world. 67
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'opposing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: opposing
...th, in some occasions it is challenging to oppose against the existence of Gods gift, whe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the fastest'.
Suggestion: worlds the fastest
...constant practice. Clarifying that, the worlds fastest man Usain Bolt would not be himself, if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s gift, as it is evident that he trains everyday and stick to the constraint diet. Furth...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 5.60731707317 553% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97627118644 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80461309978 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 106.607317073 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4803058945 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172673808844 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538415424865 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407775272307 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940268509949 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375028082367 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 40.7170731707 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.