The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
While technological application has covered almost the human life, there is a quarter population who have not approach it yet, so that the advocates label that technology is separating the poor from the world. In fact, the number: a quarter of population, came from fruit of technology, whose target was pulling human closer. hence, I do believe that, technology still benefit human more than what we saw.
it is undeniable that, as same as a natural selection, the numerous of people were left behind in this technological race, unfortunately, the poor was chosen. By only one dollar per day, the sole solution could bring them to technological civilization is receiving lagged smartphones from developing countries; even the internet, has not been launched in poor countries. Despite the fact that, recognizing the poor is pulled out from social by technology is so clearly, but it is hard to accept the coming back of backward people, who want to re-connect. The prove is, the different smartphone generations or vehicles, still keeps distance between human even in one nation. Therefore, the poor having bad conditions to update their knowledge, always feel more inferior and less attractive than others, so that they are easy to push away.
However, the scientists are actively re-connecting the poor with society thanks to technology. From Morse code to Binary code, human really improved the speed of contacting among people in the distance of the Earth’s hemisphere. The proves are, by ra-da devices, we could find more mysterious tribes; by advanced medical devices, we could save more human life; and by more different technologies, we could mobilization money from philanthropists rapidly to help people in need, furthermore, decreasing time from months to several seconds. From the positive outlook, technology is helpful than harmful; at least, the empathy to the poor is encouraged in recent years. No matter what prejudices, the true purpose of technology is helping the poor.
hence, the gap between the rich and the poor does not come from technology, but human personality. Once again, I do believe that, though technology has bad consequences, it is still a nice prospect to the poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | fhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Harpreet Singh Kooner | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | smiles | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Muhammed_10 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important while other people think that a stable job is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'approached'.
Suggestion: approached
...re is a quarter population who have not approach it yet, so that the advocates label tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... whose target was pulling human closer. hence, I do believe that, technology still be...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...benefit human more than what we saw. it is undeniable that, as same as a natura...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ackward people, who want to re-connect. The prove is, the different smartphone generation...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...e of technology is helping the poor. hence, the gap between the rich and the poor ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, really, second, so, still, therefore, while, at least, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23595505618 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94625831793 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0449461283 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.266666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132383226503 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535873766886 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375598392357 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096446106312 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363888944332 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.