Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is true that household waste are not recycled in a sufficient way, so some people believe that the sole method to raise public awareness of recycling is imposing a regulation by the government. Personally, I think recycling law is of great necessity in a society where people often do not pay their attention to this matter.
Firstly, people often do not think about the consequences of their wrongdoings towards the environment such as dropping waste at a wrong place or avoiding sending their household rubbish to collection banks to separate them. In addition, they assume that someone is paid to collect garbage from their home, so these people will take full responsibility for handling and processing their waste. Therefore, making recycling compulsory for every single household would contribute enormously to mitigating detrimental effects on the environment and our society as a whole.
Secondly, as a result of a consumer culture, we are living in a thrown-away society where people throw their items immediately if they break instead of fixing. Besides, advertisers and companies often encourage clients to follow the latest fashions; so when there are new products released on the market, people are not reluctant to get rid of their items and purchase new ones. If the government adopts a strict rule on recycling household waste, people will worry about the fine or punishments they would get, which helps to reduce the amount of rubbish significantly.
In conclusion, I am completely an advocate of the idea that the authority should make household recycling mandatory for everyone to protect the environment and save raw materials and natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 70
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 61
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish. 61
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sufficient way" with adverb for "sufficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e that household waste are not recycled in a sufficient way, so some people believe that the sole m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28358208955 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9305752558 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.1508283324 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 157.333333333 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1111111111 7.06120827912 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317207069344 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125275945006 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491571357423 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183586525562 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742200439758 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.