In the new millennium and by the advent of the internet almost every sphere of human lives has been altered in some ways.
In the new millennium and by the advent of the internet almost every sphere of human lives has been altered in some ways. In this regard, some people, unlike many others, freely download music and books from various sites without paying the required expenses. By my reckoning, this method could cause destructive impacts involving financial and social on the community which should not be ignored easily.
First and foremost reason mentioning by the opponents of this claim might be that copying materials via the internet free of charge, incontrovertibly, harm the producer not only financially, but also morally. Due to the fact that any musicians or writers supposed to invest a great deal of time and energy to create invaluable music or book, they need huge financial resources to overcome the expenditure of their work. Therefore, using their outcomes for no charge may contribute to the end of their professional work and they may be wrecked. In addition to this, it is quite immoral to misuse others work and this can lead to promoting unethical concept among the public especially millennial. It is true to say that by doing this, citizens could get accustomed to ignoring each other rights which can cause devastating social effects in the long-time.
On the other hand, the advocates claim that copying music and books could result in a livelier society and increment the study time; nevertheless, this idea is increasingly under fire for a multitude of cogent reasons. In order to establish a more energetic community and enhance the study period, the authorities should raise the awareness of people in this regard. It is not justifiable to utilize music or book free of charge for these reasons.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks, it is crystal clear that under no circumstances copying materials for no charge is acceptable except the producers have already allowed for that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-12 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 84 | view |
- It is true to say that in the new millennium, the general public tends to follow specific similar lifestyle in terms of clothing, meals, and types of TV programs. 78
- The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994. 84
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 78
- Some people support the idea of imposing taxes on fossil fuels ( oil, coal, and gas) in order to reduce energy consumption. Others disagree with this approach.Consider the debate and its arguments, and come to your own conclusion. 78
- The charts compare the volume of water utilized for the industry, agriculture, and houses in six various locations around the globe. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, in addition, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10191082803 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78099704817 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.6301065167 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147337708008 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887568409724 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.275013653143 0.0667982634062 412% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107080155656 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178438945945 0.056905535591 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.