If a product is good or it meets people’s needs, people will buy it. Advertising is no more than a form of entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree
These days more companies tend to advertise their products through the madia all around the world, however there are people who believe that this way is not practical because a high-quality good finds its position among the customers. I personally stick to the second idea, therefore I intend to state my reasons as follows.
Not surprisingly, advertisement play a pivotal role in introducing the material of a new-established corporation, but this claim that some guys constantly say the advertisement is the only root to keep the rate of sell in high-level globally, seems relatively unreasonable. Nokia was one of the pioneer and prominent manufacture in digital tools in particular cell phone, nonetheless this giant company could not rival with others. Thus above-mentioned example reveals properly if you would be unable to produce modern and novel products in the market, failure is waiting for you, undoubtedly.
Further and even more importantly, a number of start-up corporations are active in advertisement industries exaggerate about the impact of this methods in prosperity, as a result, they can forever extract money from the pocket of authorities in eminent companies in order to maintain their reputation on the top of the chart. Even though, some frank people have stuck to this conservative opinion that promoting the products internationally acts more than just entertainment.
As a consequence, I once again restate my opinion which advertisements may come in handy in the primary level but the quality and consumer`s satisfactory are two effective ways to be remained in the global competitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-05 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | DungNgo | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | Anila Stephen | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | drtruong92 | 61 | view |
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any f 95
- Here and more people are relying on the private car at their major meant of transportation. Describe some of the problems over-reliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solution. 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 89
- More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work.what will be the consequences of this? what solutions can you offer? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nt company could not rival with others. Thus above-mentioned example reveals properl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...dustries exaggerate about the impact of this methods in prosperity, as a result, the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be remained in the global competitions.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42519685039 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30456409233 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685039370079 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.55417528 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.25 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172775096617 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651232812081 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615782905155 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917620453202 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383540151959 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.