The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
It is true that family members are spending less time on having meals with others these days. There are several reasons for this trend and it also causes some impacts on their daily life.
On the one hand, there are double main reasons why people trend to having lunch or dinner out. Firstly, it is the higher pressure at work that put employees in a tight budget of time for their meals. In deeds, with stronger competition at work, a large number of workers are coping with workloads, letting them alone having leisure time to enjoin dinners, or even though break first, at home. Secondly, the growth of fast food industry provides officiers an easier access to save their eating time. Let’s take Vingroups as a stark example, had it not been for the convinience of quik - food order services/restaurants like Grab, KFC or MC Donand, thousands of Vingroup’s employees would have never met their needs of refresh the energy with only 1 hour break-time at noon.
On the other hand, this trend haves many impacts on human livings. The first effect is that it cultivates the isolation between family members. Undeniably, the less family members eating together, the more they become seperated from others. Further and even more significantly, countless disvorces are recorded as a result of husbands or wifes could not frequently cook at home. Besides, worker ‘s health detorioration is another negative consequence of eating out. On the ground of being dependently relied on fast foods or quik-restaurants, a large number of employees suffer from diseases such as obesity or problems relating to stomatch.
In conclusion, the fact that people spend less time to have meals with their family are becoming more and more remarkable. Many indicators take responsibilities for this trend and it haves a variety of impacts on human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that it is more benefit to take part in sports which are played by a team, like football, while other think that taking part in individual sport, like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eds, with stronger competition at work, a large number of workers are coping with workloads, lett...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...lied on fast foods or quik-restaurants, a large number of employees suffer from diseases such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves a variety of impacts on human life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08524590164 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81269290945 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593442622951 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3223301742 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099657350151 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408054950545 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330602227942 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802836863833 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380141900323 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.