Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons ? Solutions to change negative attitudes
There is no doubt that tourist industry brings the range of benefits to every nation. However, it is believed that international visitors contribute to considerable disadvantages in the countries they come. Thus, in this essay, i will present the effects as well as some suitable methods to solve the problem.
It is obvious that tourists from overseas cause threat to other areas. First and foremost, they have a huge impact on the environment. It is shown that many people litter in wrong places, which leads to the pollution. Moreover, trampling upon ground constantly can reduce the ability of plants’ proliferation or cause the growth of soil erosion. Secondly, it might be dangerous when residents are under threat of epidemic from foreign visitors. For instance, initially, Ebola was found only in Africa, but this was soon spreaded to many regions and triggered a massive number of fatalities.
Last but not least, this issue also contributes to the prejudice among different countries. Contrary to what people assume like “coming to other countries help broaden our horizons”, it is apparent that local residents are not willing to share their understanding for the others at first sight. For example, Saudi Arabia’s inhabitants might find women who show a lot of cleavage unacceptable. Or perhaps, people in Asia regions regard European’s customs as discourtesy.
Some measurements can be taken to change this negative attitude. Firstly, the government in every country should both make indications in each tourist site and let the tour guides inform travellers about those. These methods are not only reduce the risk of pollution but also eliminate discrimination among nations. Secondly, there should be careful examination for tourists from overseas in the airport, which helps prevent the pervasion of diseases.
Every issue has two sides, it is undeniable that international industry may cause some controversial problem. Nonetheless, I believe that by applying appropriate procedures, the result will be better in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | Arfaatkhan | 84 | view |
- Topic: Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 61
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 56
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...untries they come. Thus, in this essay, i will present the effects as well as som...
^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cleavage seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of cleavages'.
Suggestion: a lot of cleavages
...s inhabitants might find women who show a lot of cleavage unacceptable. Or perhaps, people in Asi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.478125 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05117645088 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6657965655 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2631578947 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12991192452 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329557880213 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366284019247 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627501319436 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016983435896 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.