TPO23(integrated)
The author in the reading puts forward three explanations of the yellow cedar decline, whereas the professor refutes that unsound is each of these explanation.
To begin with, the author contends that insect parasites, accurately the cedar bark beetle are the main reasons that caused the reduction in the yellow cedar's population. However, the professor contends that those small insects are not the fundamental cause of the decline. Since its barks and leaves contain a high percentage of powerful chemicals which is detrimental to the insects, the yellow cedar is much more resistant than any other types of trees. As a consequence, hardly would a healthy cedar suffer from insects' damages.
Secondly, the author ascribes the decline in cedar to brown bears in this hypothesis. On the contrary, the professor deems that though brown bears destroy some cedars, they should not responsible for the overall fall of population. The professor adds that both mainland and islands are vulnerable to the decline of cedar, but in the latter some islands there exists no bears at all.
Finally, the author points out that gradual volatilities of climate may contribute to the decrease in the yellow cedar's population, and the cold temperatures in the winter nights lead to frozen roots which threatens the health of the whole tree. As a refutation, the professor states that the exposure of roots in cold winters would not kill the trees. Given one factor left in consideration, more yellow cedars are died in low elevation where the weather is warm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-18 | cathy60321 | 80 | view |
| 2015-06-28 | negin papen | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this explanation' or 'these explanations'?
Suggestion: this explanation; these explanations
...ofessor refutes that unsound is each of these explanation. To begin with, the author contends...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
...that caused the reduction in the yellow cedars population. However, the professor cont...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
...ontribute to the decrease in the yellow cedars population, and the cold temperatures i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13833992095 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6501615216 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573122529644 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5365018514 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.181818182 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33710358777 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120802041889 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518600745062 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181763189859 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604270082531 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.