A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The education should be provided to all the citizens of a country as it is considered as the birth right of a human being. A nation must ensure that all the school-going kids get proper education. However, I cannot agree with the above statement that a government should impose same curriculum all over the country.
First of all, the very purpose of gathering knowledge is, the process must be perpetual and knowledge must be gained from various aspects of life. The students need to know about various things as the foundation or basic of the subjects they are going to study in the future. There are many areas of studies and it is not feasible to teach all of those as the preliminary learning. If the government of a nation makes an uniform method of learning or curriculum then that nation will lag behind in many other areas. Parochial mentality and superstitious believes can be eradicated by proper way of education in different fields. All the students will have a narrow outlook if the curriculum does not vary. Hence it is expected that if there is a chance for implementing various forms of education, then it will be easier for a nation to have all kind of knowledgeable people. For instance, in Japan the students are taught their area of predilection or preference from the very early stage which makes the pupils more erudite.
Furthermore, same curriculum in all over the country will induce reluctance or boredom among the teachers and the students. If same curriculum is applied in every institutions of a country then the faculty members will become indifferent to teach new things to the students and this will affect them in a negative way. Expansion of knowledge and getting expert in one particular field need a vast knowledge about many aspects of our lives. For this very reason, a nation should not allow its institutions to follow the same curriculum.
Finally, every institution is unique and this very uniqueness makes the schools sophisticated in their own ways. A school might be very good for mathematics or for arts or for history. If the teachers and experts get to choose the way a school should provide education to its pupils, then it becomes less difficult for a government to design a uniform curriculum. Moreover, different curriculum like English medium, English version, medium in the mother tongue ( e.g. Japanese curriculum, Hindi medium, Bengali medium) make the decisionmaking process easier for the parents of the students.
On the contrary, some may refute the claims by stating that various form of curriculum will create a hodgepodge situation in a nation. It will be troublesome for the schools to come up with their own curriculum and variety in curriculum will create an imbalance in the nation.
In a nutshell, according to Chinese philosophy, everything has some positive and negative sides. We should be responsible for choosing the right things for us. As illustrated in the write-up, the positive aspects of not imposing same curriculum is higher than the negative ones, I demur that a nation should follow same curriculum.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 69
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man being. A nation must ensure that all the school-going kids get proper educati...
^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ng. If the government of a nation makes an uniform method of learning or curriculu...
^^
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
.... Parochial mentality and superstitious believes can be eradicated by proper way of educ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...utlook if the curriculum does not vary. Hence it is expected that if there is a chanc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the students and this will affect them in a negative way. Expansion of knowledge and getting exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ish version, medium in the mother tongue e.g. Japanese curriculum, Hindi medium, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, for instance, kind of, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2573.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97678916828 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82318819752 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464216634429 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3861756627 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.208333333 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5416666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257135659641 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795676682763 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561060395881 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145298016316 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335549617599 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.