Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As the method of value shows, all of human beings work for happiness. When we have ensured the basic life needs, for referring to Marlow's Hierary of Needs, we will purchase for internal power, such as a sense of belonging and happiness. One of the effective ways of getting happiness is making friends. Friends can support us when we are in trouble. A friend can be the person who we want to share happiness with. And I think long-period friends are very important.
First of all, getting along with long-period friends is easier. If we have a new friend, we always want he or her known that I am a wonderful friend. Sometimes, we pretend to act what we do not have in our personal life. That let us feel tired. For instance, when I want to walk to a person which I want to make friends with, I consciously or unconsciously care about my wearing and make-up and doubt whether it suit or not to let him or her thinking I am good. Of course, in this situation, I will feel nervous and a little uncomfortable. So, instead of using this time to make a new friend, I would like to pay attention to my old friends.
Secondly, communicating with old friends is more interesting. The more time we get along with, the more topics we can talk about. Just like me, my friends always recall my memories of old experience, such as some funny and amazing things in our childhood, the difficult we met in the sports meeting many years ago. To review these things can also improve our relationship. Let us feel we are be remembered by and belonging to the world.
Last but not least, nearly all of our old friends have high moral qualities. If a person has any virtue, we may not have a friendship with him or her for so long time. And the prerequisite of happiness in a relationship is a virtue, such as warmhearted, honest, kind. So, is it any meaning for making friends will betray you? I think it is sophisticated to keep our relationship with our old friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- pterosaurs'fly 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- pterosaurs'flying 76
- pterosaurs 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ve our relationship. Let us feel we are be remembered by and belonging to the worl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44846796657 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70946317761 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50139275766 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4988901966 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.4347826087 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6086956522 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20982407886 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719797172349 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497939595936 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143171994311 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176038146268 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 58.1214874552 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.