In today’s job market, it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With increasing scarcity of the job, a controversial issue has developed whether practical ability is more significant as compare to static knowledge and it may be possible qualification will be became just show of paper, in order to that all people would be assess by the dynamic skill of real time. This view has a many positive points and in my perception this opinion would be became true in future and I firmly believe in practical expertise has more advantages.
There are many manifolds for shore up my point of view. First and foremost, practical skills mean real time problem solving ability without that it could be tough to survive in 21st century because of theory just a describe the words but without implement there is no need of static knowledge. For instance computer science students have depth knowledge about artificial intelligence they know each topics but without practicals like how to train the systems, there is no meaning of theory of AI. Although some ability would be tough to display in contemporary world like theory of relativity, innovated by Albert Einstein. But often it would be easy to judge with practical skill of particular people.
Further emaphasizing on my point of view, nowadays all work will become more challanging hence, without proper skill work could be tough for many people. Since many people have great grades in high schools, plethora of multinational companies often judge the employee by their real-time practical skills. For example, nowadays Google often higher the employees by his programming abilities they not consider the marks. Also, they totally removes the root of evaluation process by using new algorithms that is dependent on employee practical ability. Hence, we can say that implementation skills has more indispensable as compare to just static and book dependent skills.
To conclude, every coin has two sides, judging system by formal qualifications in not exception, in many government organization use marksheet as a gate of opportunity and after they take the interview process. But, practical skills are inevitable in every aspect. Thus, undeniably I would like to say that employee had better to enhance their practical expertise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | learnafren | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | sharanyam | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | Jamie Dung Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | Jamie Dung Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- Topic: More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 48
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 50
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... in 21st century because of theory just a describe the words but without implement there i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'remove'
Suggestion: remove
... consider the marks. Also, they totally removes the root of evaluation process by using...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23314606742 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81790019024 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2710260136 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117556501991 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040842113307 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292253928987 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735721098676 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134451069807 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.