In every field, politics, government and business, those in power should step down after five years.
"Power corrupts the absolute and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is an adage that has gained relevance in recent years. The centralization of power structures in politics and education has led to a debilitating increase in corruption and incompetency. Every position of responsibility should have a stipulated time-frame. Hierarchies should be changed periodically and fresh breath should be instilled at opportune moments.
The reasons for enforcing strict tenures in politics and government are twofold. Firstly, the presence of deadlines will impel public servants to exercise their powers judiciously and work earnestly. The knowledge that their positions are dispensable will act as deterrent against corrupt and immoral practices. Prolonged periods of power have been shown to considerably elevate instances of malafide actions and infarctions.
Secondly, power structures such as government and businesses need to be decentralized. Most economists and policy experts feel that a top-down approach towards decision-making not only mitigates inefficiency, but also promotes healthier traits such as camaraderie and a willingness to acknowledge shortcomings. In most federal democracies, bills are debated and passed at two levels, a state-or community level and the national level. The evaluation of bills at multiple stages of government ensures bipartisan support. A constant rejig of office-bearers and government officials empowers decentralization.
Contrast this with an authoritarian regime in which the decision-making authority rests with a select group of individuals. Since there is no consultation with the stakeholders, laws are more likely to be oppressive and regressive. The proliferation of these dictatorial regimes can be traced back to prolonged periods in office. This is particularly evident in military regimes such as Pakistan and Iraq, countries in which democratically-elected governments have been overthrown by military generals. In countries like Nigeria and Sudan, these leaders often impose indefinite term limits for their office.
Well-defined durations of power act as a system of checks-and-balances. It offers an opportunity for people to eliminate inefficiency. A dispensation which is apathetic to the interests of the people can be voted out of power at the end of their stipulated term. This dissuades large enterprises from making rash and overarching decisions.
The need for change is one that is shared by all. The biggest threat to success in an enterprise or a government is fatigue. When leadership structures are changed periodically, fresh life is incorporated into the field. This buoys up people's spirits and leads to an overall increase in productivity. Unquestionably, the existential certainty of constant change acts as a moral compass for those in power.
- In every field, politics, government and business, those in power should step down after five years. 58
- Due to the small possibility of people dying due to the cow vaccine, routine vaccination drives should be abandoned. 93
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2431.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87198067633 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59284313404 2.79657885939 128% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589371980676 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0197279302 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.037037037 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7037037037 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152583663138 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361845195643 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332526420736 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715386987331 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375288786437 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.17 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.38706741573 124% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.