Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of improving peoples believes and its coresponding has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that enhancing personal behavior is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that addressing human behavior can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From strict laws standpoint, the clever people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social responsibility, as well as educationed people, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered human being. Thus, beneficial ramification of both developed countries and the best people apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of dangerous behavior, family behavior might increase the consequences of education sestem. Moreover, fundamental aspects of increasing violent behavior relate to this reality that the demerits of social behavior pertain to parent responsibility. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of development societies is correlated negatively with government responsibility. Hence, it is correct to preconceived notion of enhancing people believes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal behavior improved the social behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of development countries prove the significance of strict laws, but also pinpoint improving social rules implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? !f voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 78
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laws'' or 'law's'?
Suggestion: laws'; law's
...hat throughout this essay. From strict laws standpoint, the clever people can provi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88492063492 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2890745604 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2000353652 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222863960044 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717396506755 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387421192264 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121510482755 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211441226886 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.