The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The line graph give information about the jobless rates in 2 countries, namely US and Canada, from March 1993 to March 1999.
As is observed, the two countries experienced contrasting trends, the unemployment rate in US fell while the figure for Japan rose. It is also noticeable that both countries had similar rates by 1998.
In March 1993, 7% of the US labour force was unemployed, which was 3 times as much as the figure for Japan at 2.8. Over the following five years, jobless rate in the US fluctuated and decreased gradually to 4.5. By contrast, the unemployment rate in Japan also fluctuated but finally increased to 4.
In March 1999, the unemployment rate for both countries was the same, reaching 4.5 each, after which both countries rates changed in different trends. Afterwards, the Japanese men power which was unemployed continued rising while the US witnessed a gradual decline.
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present. 61
- More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive trend? 61
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a value source of information. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after construction of some tourist facilities 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77076804434 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1402954126 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393520997894 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194370972044 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118525417381 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257081229519 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936808140068 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.