As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilites. Do you agree or disagree?
it is argued that companies should focus on not only making a profit but also taking responsibilities for society. While I hold a strong belief that profits should be considered first, enterprises’s social responsibilities also bring several profitable merits.
On the one hand, making money is generally businesses’ priority in the current competitive market. If projects are not lucrative, it will be difficult for them to remain successful. For example, firms with high return on asset rates appear to be more accessible to attract investors or assure banks to loan capitals. also, provided that companies desire to promote sustainably, it is imperative for them to create progressive revenues. it is likely to be a virtuous circle that returns could be used for reinvestment in improving product, which help to make more profits to reinvest more effectively as a result.
On the other hand, being involved in social responsibilities could also bring financial benefits to companies in certain ways. Firstly, entrepreneurs responsible for community tend to have more chances to attract customers’ attention, saving a considerable amount of money on advertising. For example, charity works mentioned widely on everyday social media and newspapers could approach to millions of audience all over the world. Secondly, it is more marketable for the companies to build the images to stand out from other rivals in such a competitive market nowadays. Consumers who get direct profit from welfare provided would be willing to buy the companies' products and service.
In conclusion, I do believe that apart from earning returns, being responsible for mutual community also brings significant opportunities to businesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- Living in a country when you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that companies should focus o...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...stors or assure banks to loan capitals. also, provided that companies desire to prom...
^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...or them to create progressive revenues. it is likely to be a virtuous circle that ...
^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignificant opportunities to businesses.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58113207547 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28985625026 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618867924528 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1563160396 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127644560599 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506313538899 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443970602379 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830452155111 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00977583817851 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.