Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
It is often suggested that disciples of tertiary institutions should have a wide range of subjects in their curriculum rather than a few particular subjects. I, however, disagree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, universities aim to provide specialized knowledge to their disciples, not enhance their general knowledge. Students are offered admission to universities after they compete many years academic studies on various subjects. They are in a tertiary institution primarily to gain specific knowledge related to their field of interest. Giving redundant pressure by imposing subjects unrelated to their field can become a hurdle in achieving the required goal sets in their life. For instance, there is little relationship between sociology and mathematics. Mathematics majors will get confused while learning various aspects of sociology and similarly, sociology student will be reluctant to solve complex mathematics.
In addition to this, many universities are already striving hard to maintain their recognized status and some are providing only specializations in few subjects. The addition of more subjects in each faculty will add unnecessary weight and as a result, there will be discordant opinions and actions among them. For example, Indian instituted of Delhi is among the top universities in India and provides specialization in scientific research and technology. If they are forced to add Arts related subjects to their science majors, they will soon find themselves struggling for their excellence.
In conclusion, universities are meant for specialization and students should study subjects related to their major or which they feel interested in. The urge of adding a spectrum of irrelevant subjects will detriment the meaning of university education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | prabhpreet kaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | prabhpreet kaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | prabhpreet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | prabhpreet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | prabhpreet kaur | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that growing economy can be useful to those people who are poor and hungry. Others think that this can influence the environment.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems the solutions are not effective Why are the solutions ineffective How can these problems be solved 87
- Some people think that top level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to take any decision while other disagree. 73
- Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes 56
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75757575758 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10970776266 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6233640828 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16294867518 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685247616982 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783704540199 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118365533371 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504751244125 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.