In recent years, the development of traffic safety has been gradually a subject of increasing concern. I agree that using stricter punishments on driving offences is a useful way to rising road safety, but it is not the only method. So I total disagree that enhancing traffic safety is undertook by posing more punishments alone.
On the one hand, placing more strictly punishments on drivers with illegal behaviours can make significant contributions to improve the safety of traffic. For example, organizations in power can increase the level of financial punishments with people who drive beyond the allowed speed. By doing this, a number of drivers with limited incomes would adjust their behaviours properly because of the financial pressure, which can reduce unpredictable and serious accidents. It is likely that the high level of punishments is one of the effective ways to develop traffic safety.
On the other hand, besides putting strictly punishments on driving offences, there are still useful measures even more effective to innovate traffic system safety. The most superiority is to expand the system of traffic road. The reason behind this idea is that the huge number of transportations moving in the high level of density is the main factor leading to serious accidents. In fact, the government should invest more money and other resources in the innovation of traffic constructions. As a consequence, the advanced road system could reduce considerably a number of accidents.
In conclusion, although posing stricter punishments on people who do not follow traffic law is a great way to develop road safety, the most effective method is the combination of various ways such as the measure and expanding road constructions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | nguyen thi thu hien | 56 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 86
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professional in eight groups. Decribe the information shown to a university or collage lecturer. 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38738738739 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99698195185 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6986921357 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208774694178 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083583522535 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698421122887 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148178298066 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409756265351 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.