In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In my point of view, both of the statement have advantages and disadvantages each of them. Governments maybe construct new railways for high speed trains because they know that in about decade later or more, they will need a transportation which tackle traffic jam and capable to travel with minimum of time. They think in the era of digital with the high intensity of occupation and tight schedule which proclaimed by most companies will impact people to travel more with less wasting of time even thought this program will cost much money rather than the program which existing public transports.
Meanwhile, the reasons why governments argue about repairing the old public transports because they have objection if these public transports will comeback to operate maximally when its use have over the limit of the age of the vehicle. Furthermore, the prefer to change the public transportation with the new one instead of recondition the existing one because they’ve already knew if they spend much money to fix it all, it will cost lots of money rather than buy a new one or replace with the sophisticated model of vehicle which is one of the example is super fast trains.
Nevertheless, governments may think that the idea of changing public transportation should consider the aspect of environment whereas this fast trains will pollute environment or not subsequently it will impact traffic jam or not because of the project of building of new railway lines between cities. On the other hand, even improving existing public transportation has less advantages, other seem begging the old public transports because the driver of the old one doesn’t want to be jobless and in my view, the governments should think about how many unemployed will rise if they deactivate existing transportations too.
All in all, building new fast trains has lots of advantages rather that disadvantages but governments have to tackle unemployment of the old drivers who have this occupation for years to make sure them have better occupation when it will deactivate. At last but not least, the traffic jam and pollution of building new railways won’t impact so much to the environment especially communities between cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online.Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken account when deciding on the punishment. 67
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online.Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 56
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of the age of the vehicle. Furthermore, the prefer to change the public transportation wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun advantages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ving existing public transportation has less advantages, other seem begging the old ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16022099448 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90603008175 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486187845304 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.2975951904 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.020119225 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 207.555555556 106.682146367 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.2222222222 20.7667163134 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244639929661 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103815834463 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529469269443 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153269342201 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593849550973 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 13.0946893788 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.54 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.1190380762 178% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.