Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hungry and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should ne stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, It is widely argued about economic growth. Most people assume that this is the best way to end hungry and poverty. Behinds that, some individuals think that economic growth have bad effect on environment and it should be stopped. In my opinion, it would be better to develop the economic due to various benefits.
In the one hand, developing economic brings numerous advantage. Everyday in the world, there are many problems about social that attract to people, exceptionally is question how to end hungry and poverty. Most people assume that economic growth is the best way since they could spend money providing for starving people. As far as I know, the rate of starving people in the huge countries is purely tiny because they are adequate condition to upgrade the human’s life. For instance, Sudan- the poorest country in the world with 400 people die due to hungry. Thus, developing countries often donate currency or food in order to reinforce their life. Moreover, economic growth has a chance of ending not only hungry but also poverty. To inhabitant, poverty is scaring things because they are poor about all term. They could not have likelihood to promote about education or medical. They would become outdated more than other countries. For instance, in remote region, children do not have an opportunity to go to school since they have to work in order to assist their parents. Hence, standard of living is definitely low. Therefore, I strongly believe that economic growth is important thing to change the country.
In the other hand, some individuals insist on watching to the bad term. They presume that economic growth would damage the environment, and it should be stopped. Developing countries means developing everything such as the number of vehicles is completely high. People would use vehicle frequently so smog could destroy the landscape country. But do they think bad impact if they end the economic growth. People in the world would live with poverty and children would live without experience. Instead of stopping economic growth, people could implement some other solution such as calling for helping from countries or providing more policy to tighten human awareness. It can be seen that numerous rich countries always keep clear atmosphere since they mitigate maximize vehicle and use more public transport.
In conclusion, I always believe that economic growth brings various changing for people, although some individuals think that it would deplete the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- When children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents. Do you agree or disagree 67
- now you do voluntary work for local community, but you are unable to continue doing this job. write your manager of this location 73
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- tell about your job 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...ing economic brings numerous advantage. Everyday in the world, there are many problems a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that it would deplete the environment.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20935960591 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57134481679 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0460601403 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3461538462 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290145776821 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893661894044 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878362842917 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20589314287 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079910566774 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.