taking more time to take an important decision is viewed as a bad quality by most while some think it is a good quality" what do u think? Give reasons for your opinion
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides. People must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to the conclusion. After all, each and every question or topics requires a careful deliberation in that there are always multiple variables to a truth. Even though some may adamantly believe that taking a lot of time can be considered at a positive parameter for a person’s personality, I strongly think such opinions lack coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, history has proven that it is a negative element for a person’s characteristic since making immediate decision reflects a person’s analytical ability and also the person can grasp valuable opportunities.
First and foremost, To point out is that what provokes people to make quick decisions is showing their analytical ability. As a matter of fact, one of the rigors of modern hectic life is that people’s lives have a lot of ups and downs and people face with the complicated situations that people need to cope these problems as soon as possible. It is axiomatic that individuals can prove their analytical abilities in these critical situations. Once I and my friend had sat for GRE examination. I was a little lazy to think. I had no quick thinking ability but he had. We sat for exam same time and same center but because of his quick thinking abilities he did a decent score but I did not. I was in trouble to manage time during the exam because of taking too much time to answer per questions. On the other hand, my friend was able to save time because of his quick answerability. To illustrate more, take a case of a person who runs into a huge problem and he has a lot of financial concerns for instance. He should gather enough information, broaden his horizons and analyze the situation then make a rational decision about how he can solve his problem. In this way, not only does he find best feet forward, but also he proves his ingenious manner to the people. Hence, making a quick decision can be highly beneficial.
On top of this, point out the seizing precious opportunity can be considered another remarkable advantage of making an immediate decision. For example, Once a devastating flood occurred in a countryside. The government was not willing to take a huge time to rescue the victims. He makes an alternate plan to rescue the victims, such as provide them alternate shelter in the primary school, provide many boats to transfer from this place. Then secure their life instantly. If he took more time to plan, then many people would lose their lives and resource. It is absolutely undeniable, in the competitive world of today people should grasp opportunity in order to make a promising future for themselves. In this way, they need to be a health-conscious because opportunities may vanish in a blink of an eye. In my own experience last year my close friend introduced two companies which employed specialists computer programmer but I could not make a quick decision. Consequently, neither I did grasp the opportunities, nor I could get decent jobs in my field, If I could make the immediate decision then definitely I could gain a hurdle of money and revolutionized my life by working in a prestigious company. Therefore, if a person can not make a decision quickly and in a short time, he will lose the best chances which may bring a bright future for him.
In summary, yes, its virtually impossible to provide a satisfying answer to an open-ended question. On the whole, according to above-mentioned points and ideas, it is crystal clear that making a quick decision can be considered as significant merit of individuals since it reflects their analytical ability and also they can seize opportunities. It is high time overlooking the fact that a person who had a hard time for decision making is a worthy person. Have you ever see a prosperous person without having the analytical ability? Can you consider a person successful without grasping opportunities? I absolutely believe no!
- taking more time to take an important decision is viewed as a bad quality by most while some think it is a good quality" what do u think? Give reasons for your opinion 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to those of their parents, instead of choosing jobs that are completely different from their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed you should be more like others than be different from everyone else. 90
- ome parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As everything in life is like a coin that ...
^^
Line 2, column 1194, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the best'.
Suggestion: find the best
... problem. In this way, not only does he find best feet forward, but also he proves his in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 893, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'specialists'' or 'specialist's'?
Suggestion: specialists'; specialist's
...introduced two companies which employed specialists computer programmer but I could not mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as a matter of fact, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3342.0 1977.66487455 169% => OK
No of words: 687.0 407.700716846 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86462882096 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11963717896 4.48103885553 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98227451049 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 339.0 212.727598566 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493449781659 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1100.7 618.680645161 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9298501481 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4857142857 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6285714286 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31428571429 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144897139219 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386950947964 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426942332545 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950547532347 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286487301961 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.