Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?

Essay topics:

Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?

Today, over packaged products are flooding the markets. Since over packaging cost the consumers as well as the environment, there is an urgent need to curtail its usage. It is a producer’s responsibility to shun such packaging techniques. Producers should work towards both cost savings and reduce environmental damage.

Over-packaging often shoots up product’s price significantly. Therefore, less packaging will automatically pull the rate downwards. For example, McDonald packs their burgers in a paper wrap then put it in a cardboard container and then hand it to customers in a paper bag. Instead, if they only put it in a box, it will reduce the price of the burger. When looking at this example, it is evident that responsible steps by producers to cut down on excess packaging expense is not only plausible but also mutually beneficial.

Also, over packaging is a significant catalyst for environmental damage as it augments co2 emission. So It is producers responsibility to minimize harm to the ecosystem. For instance, box packaging cost trees which not only costs buyers and sellers but the whole planet. So it is the best interest of everyone to make minimal use packaging. Therefore, manufacturers should avoid over-packaging of goods.

This analysis establishes that cost saving and curtailing environmental damage is mutually profitable. In a nutshell, it is producer’s responsibility to avoid excess packaging by taking necessary steps. Producers must willingly make changes needed for the betterment of the everyone.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-10 heemagupta 77 view
2019-11-10 heemagupta 77 view
2019-10-18 maniram vicky 72 view
2019-10-05 raavi sandhu 80 view
2019-09-04 Ekta shah 77 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everyone'?
Suggestion: the; everyone
...ke changes needed for the betterment of the everyone.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49583333333 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38704383973 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595833333333 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.419881233 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5882352941 104.977214359 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1176470588 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331771234658 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113183442463 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919396139992 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2104824556 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713408954611 0.0609392437508 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.