The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of tempelton between 1990 and 2005
The two maps shows the development which seaside resort Tempelton experienced over a period of 15 years between 1990 and 2005
Overall, a comparison of two maps reveals a change from a largely rural resort to a developed resort landscape.
In the 1990, Tepelton was much greener residential area with many trees and individual houses, but during the next 15 years Tempelton witnessed a number of dramatic changes. The most noticeable change is that all trees east of the river were cut down and all individual houses we demolished to make a way for a new factory alongside the lake. An Airport was constructed near the school, also there was built a Ferry at the south-eastern part of the town.
Only a few trees west of the river remained. Big residential house was demolished to make way for apartment blocks on the north-western part. Further developments were construction of two apartment blocks and supermarket instead of individual houses. A new stretch of railway was built running from east to west part of the town.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public To what extend do you agree or disagree 72
- Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped.To what extend do you agree. 73
- Many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialise with others. This has can lead to a number of dangerous situations which can be threatening for children.What problems do children face when going online 76
- Many people think hosting as international sporting event is beneficial to a country, while others disagree.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94827586207 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86122061932 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0796866383 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181739600324 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596630444132 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112634611668 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150945608191 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138317248818 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.