The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Global warming has been a serious issue in our community nowadays. In order to decline the damage of climate conditions, the world’s convention should put the responsibility on all countries to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels. In my opinion, I totally agree with the benefits of this scheme, but there are still several problems need to be discussed.
There is no doubt that the quality of the environment has gone from bad to worse. Global warming has a significant effect on our planet, and what lead to this situation is carbon dioxide. Since many developing counties have became industrialized, numerous factories produced emissions and the vehicles exhausted fumes. The diffuse gases such as carbon dioxide lead to the greenhouse effect, as a result of climate change. The rising temperature will cause the melting of polar Ice caps and raising sea level. More extreme weather conditions such as flooding and drought we need to face in the future. These disorders not only impact the social agriculture industries but also threaten the natural animal’s habitat. As a result, countries should assume responsibility for reducing their consumptions of fossil fuel.
In additionally, fossil fuels such as gas and oil was a non-sustainable material, It is meant that one day it will be running out. Clearly, more and more countries have already built sustainable factories for non-waste energy such as solar system in order to reduce the emissions. But these facilities cost expensive, putting financial pressure on the developing countries. Also, for the single industrial areas such as Saudi Arabia(the area only sold fossil fuels ) this solution will lead to an economic crash on their society.
In conclusion, I agreed with the advantage of the consumption of fossil fuels, but the implement still needs to have some considerations.
- Developments of technology are causing environmental problems. Some people think the solution is that everyone except a simpler life, while others believe that technology can solve these problems.itDiscuss both views and make your opinion. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for ageing individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 71
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The two maps below showed road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eral problems need to be discussed. There is no doubt that the quality of th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...de. Since many developing counties have became industrialized, numerous factories prod...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng their consumptions of fossil fuel. In additionally, fossil fuels such a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...di Arabiathe area only sold fossil fuels this solution will lead to an economic c...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an economic crash on their society. In conclusion, I agreed with the advanta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31186440678 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98828508428 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5015761626 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220157768537 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061283313822 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678473530622 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136486263267 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307145395806 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.