The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK.
The chart illustrates, number of hours spend on internet by percentage of adolescent children residing in the UK playing games and chatting during a school day.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that, a considerably large % of teenage boys spent time playing video games, whereas young girls were involved doing internet chatting on per day basis. Additionally, more than 4 hours per day is utilized by both sexes using internet for above mentioned purposes. After that, 1 to 3 hours per day was maximum utilized time by youngsters in doing both gaming and chatting. When we observe the total almost equal hours are spent by both sexes on each activity.
On the one hand, less than 1 hour per day is spend on chatting by around 25% adolescents. 60% of girls and 50% of boys spend 1 to 3 hours per day talking through webspace. Furthermore, about 69% teenage girls and around 55% of boys spend more than 4 hours doing the same. When we look at the total column, approximately 61% juveniles used internet for conversing for more than 4 hours daily. About 57% of children were seen using it for 1 to 3 hours and 25% used it for less than 1hour per day.
On the other hand, about 82% of boys and 51% of girls played games on internet for more than 4 hours daily. Regarding, 1 to 3 hours per day slot around 73% of males and 50% girls were noted playing consoles. Looking at, 30% boys and 37% girls played who were playing game consoles for less than an hour. It is evident that boys played video games more than girls who spent more time on chats. The total also showed 32% and 62 % of adolescents playing for less than 1 hour and 1 to 3 hours per day respectively. 69% teenagers spent more than 4 hours per day in doing these fun activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | Trần Khánh Nhi | 78 | view |
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created a problem that did not exist before. What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solution can you suggest? 67
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining while others think that their sole purpose is to educate Which do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 89
- The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...e one hand, less than 1 hour per day is spend on chatting by around 25% adolescents. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, regarding, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 320.0 196.424390244 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.453125 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42228260745 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1463113702 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19223687605 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882111852905 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732923598429 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171121822564 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931278078963 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.