The table illustrates the social and economic statistics for Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1995 by the United Nations.
The table illustrates the social and economic statistics for Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1995 by the United Nations.
Overall, Canada and Japan show the highest social and economic indicators whereas the rates are much lower for Peru and Zaire. The adult literacy rate is very minimal for Zaire.
IN 1994, the annual income per person is much higher in Japan and Canada with exactly 15760 and 11100 dollars respectively, while the figures for Peru and Zaire are very minimal with approximately 160 and 130 dollars respectively. A similar trend is followed for life expectancy with Zaire being the least with 47 years.
People in Japan intake fewer calories compared to Canadians, and the figures for Peru and Zaire were close to 178 and 2370 calories respectively. It is interesting to note that Canada and Japan share common adult literacy rate with approximately 99%, while the adult literacy rate of Peru is almost double that of Zaire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-24 | SaranyaJeevesh | 73 | view |
- The bar graph illustrates the number of people who used public transport in a town between 2011 and 2015. 78
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The given diagram illustrates the production, processing of milk and dairy products such as cheese, cream, and butter for the commercial purpose. 73
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations. What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04430379747 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50675261733 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.752645877 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45460489181 0.215688989381 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255367881767 0.103423049105 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.311314728288 0.0843802449381 369% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385595953553 0.15604864568 247% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.356090727339 0.0819641961636 434% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.