The pie charts compare online sales in four main areas for retail sectors in Newzealand in two different time spans.
The pie charts compare online sales in four main areas for retail sectors in Newzealand in two different time spans.
Overall, after a decade online sales experienced a considerable rise in terms of film and music and books. While the trend for travel and clothes proved to be in reverse.
Looking at the graphs, it is clear that travel and film and music had the highest proportion in 2003 constituting 36% and 21% respectively. By 2013, travel sales had encountered a moderate decrease reaching 29%, while film and music sales had jumped to 33% achieving the highest sale in 2013.
Books and clothes online sales ranked fourth and second with 19% and 24% in 2003 respectively. In 2013, the former accounted for 22% and experienced a 3% increase in terms of its online sales. However, the latter was not successful regarding online sales and encountered approximately 10% losses compared with 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-27 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 61 | view |
- The table demonstrates the results of three surveys conducted in a specific university in different time span in terms of pupils perspective regarding diverse sectors of the university. 56
- In the new millennium and by the advent of the internet almost every sphere of human lives has been altered in some ways. 84
- The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British individuals donating part of their emolument to benevolent organizations in two different time span. 78
- The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees. 89
- It is true to say that normal people do not recycle their waste as far as possible. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, second, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99337748344 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70450149176 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0405333087 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383298348327 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184492513748 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.309764875589 0.0843802449381 367% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323135803362 0.15604864568 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.392195478145 0.0819641961636 478% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.