Some people think that children who spend a lot of time to read children book are wasting their time which could be better used doing other activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since a long time ago, many parents have believed that reading books can help develop children’s brains. Some argue that outdoor activities can improve the brain’s function better. In this essay, I will discuss both views.
On the one hand, many researches have proved that reading books early help students improve their performance at school. Firstly, information can be stored easier in young brain, especially language, as they have a lot of spaces. In other words, if a child practice reading at the early age, they will be able to remember most of the information that they have read and use them wisely. Additionally, early reading brings a lot of benefits for children later in their life. Most of all, it encourages children to participate on reading more books, help contribute on their logical thinking, basic speech skills and communication skills. For instance, there are many jobs that require reading skills and communication skills, so if that person is not educated to read in childhood or later in life, they will not be able to handle all the work by the deadlines, or might finish it in the nick of time.
On the other hand, some people believe that other activities such as drawing, building logo, or travelling, etc; are better in developing the world around children. In different perspective, some children are better at observing visually. Puzzling, drawing, matching, those games improve children’s imaginary and develop a creative thinking in the future.
To sum up, there are many ways that help children before middle school study well. Nevertheless, balancing the time can be the best way to reach the goal.
- Some people think that children who spend a lot of time to read children book are wasting their time which could be better used doing other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Many people choose to adopt a carefree lifestyle instead of running after wealth, fame and power despite social or family pressures. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lop a creative thinking in the future. To sum up, there are many ways that help...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12546125461 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77832579783 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8673730337 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266356007323 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918595900417 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446822114662 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152300446637 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368090159628 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.