The maps demonstrate various changes having happened in the village of Stokeford by 2010.
The maps demonstrate various changes having happened in the village of Stokeford by 2010.
Overall, the rural area has experienced dramatic changes in terms of elimination of the farmland and expansion of the houses.
Looking at the maps, it is crystal clear that the location of the post office, the primary school, and the bridge remained intact from 1930 to 2010. While the farmlands located at the South-West and East-North of the countryside in 1930 have demolished in 2010.
Regarding the accommodation, far more dwellings have been built in 2010 compared with 1930. In addition to this, the two large houses which were adjacent to the garden in 1930, have replaced with two retirement houses to provide cares for the elderly population. Finally, the gardens, located in the middle of the Stokeford in 1930, have halved in size in 2010 in order to provide more space for building new houses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-29 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 61 | view |
- It is true to say that many industrialized nations facing a wide range of physical health problems among their citizens. 89
- The table demonstrates the results of three surveys conducted in a specific university in different time span in terms of pupils perspective regarding diverse sectors of the university. 56
- The illustration demonstrates the proportion of graduates unable to find an appropriate occupation in a specific European nation over the course of a two year. 78
- The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years. 56
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, regarding, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64175867348 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1176361454 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359757603839 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211422688399 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.323812804861 0.0843802449381 384% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319293315049 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.393992178421 0.0819641961636 481% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.