Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In the scope of modernization and development, we are manufacturing more and more waste. The need for these products are very high in the human world, which later converts in to scrap, Thus results in piles of garbage. Authorities need serious attention to sort this matter quickly before it becomes a danger to society.
Firstly, the use of plastics is very common in this world and these days every product is wrapped in plastic cover whether its food or metal. More risk of plastic is its non-degradable property. Therefore the waste is increasing day by day. For illustration, the food manufacturing unit is producing the packed food items such as milk pouches and on an everyday basis, millions of pouches are manufactured to fulfil the needs of milk for the nation and world. Hence, after consumption of the product, the packaging part is scrap. Secondly, the use of gadgets by youngsters raise electronic waste to alarming levels. mobile phones, laptops and other accessories are in high demand into a society which increases the production of such items but the decomposition at the same level is not being carried out. So, the imbalance between plus and minus raise the concern.
Scientists from a different part of the world are working hard to make biodegradable plastics. Still, the government should impose a ban on such products as the productive outcome from scientists is away from the reach. Which in return force the society to use alternatives like paper and cotton bags. Moreover, high taxation to such products will also bring better results for the community and minimum use by industries by applying rules and regulations on them through authorities.
In conclusion, the imbalance between manufacturing and destruction of the item is the main culprit and the government needs dire notice, applying high duties and laws against these products to minimize the waste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Ankita7443 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | priteshshah16 | 56 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 61
- People should work a fixed number of hours per week, and employers should not ask anybody to work more than this. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. 56
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The role of education is to prepare children for the modern world. School should cut art and music out of the curriculum so that children can focus on useful subjects such as information technology. To what extent do you agree? 67
- These days many families move abroad for work. Some people believe that this benefits the children in these families. Others believe that it makes their lives more difficult.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...plastic is its non-degradable property. Therefore the waste is increasing day by day. For...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mobile
...se electronic waste to alarming levels. mobile phones, laptops and other accessories a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85170230483 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0150192561 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0657863856643 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0238807764764 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447893136357 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0430939237466 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335656879943 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.