The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph indicates changes in the quantities of 4 different kinds of meat eaten in one European country from 1974 until 2004.Overall, it can be seen that there was a marked growth in chicken consumption, whereas the popularity of the other food types tapered off over the given period.
Regarding the beef consumption, in 1979,it was the by far the most popular among these food types with roughly 225 grams consumed by each person weekly.Following this, lamb and chicken were eaten in similar amounts at the around the 150 grams level, while much less fish was consumed at just approximately 50 grams.
However,after 25 years, the consumption of beef and lamb declined drastically to roughly 100 grams and 55 grams respectively.Also,the consumption of fish tailed off to just below 50 grams and remained the least prefered food variety.
Turning to the consumption of chicken, by contrast, showed an upward trend, overtaking that of lamb in 1980 and that of beef by 1989.In 1989, it soared to almost 250 grams per person weekly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | gwagwa0271 | 56 | view |
- Analysts tell us that many people today feel stressed and think they have insufficient control over their lives What problems do such feelings cause for people What remedies could you suggest 92
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the Internet is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 84
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 56
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000. 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...e European country from 1974 until 2004.Overall, it can be seen that there was a marked...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Following
...25 grams consumed by each person weekly.Following this, lamb and chicken were eaten in si...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fish is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... around the 150 grams level, while much less fish was consumed at just approximately...
^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , after
... just approximately 50 grams. However,after 25 years, the consumption of beef and l...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...hly 100 grams and 55 grams respectively.Also,the consumption of fish tailed off to j...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...100 grams and 55 grams respectively.Also,the consumption of fish tailed off to just ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...f lamb in 1980 and that of beef by 1989.In 1989, it soared to almost 250 grams per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02307691778 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1300322044 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 219.0 112.824112599 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125726472629 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734243523433 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442445834878 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734243523433 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442445834878 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 13.2329268293 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.13 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 11.0658536585 253% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.