Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is one of the most important human rights and teachers are responsible to educate our society. So teaching is dignified and sacred professions in our ideal world, but actually teaching is one of the under-appreciated profession as teachers do not get enough credits and feedback from students and institution. Criticization always build a career and for teaching, it is more important than other professions. But, giving money according to their student's performance is a bit much even for a harsh criticization, so, I am against the idea and I am going to provide feasible reasons to bolster my stance.
First of all, criticization for any profession is important but pare money for others performance is unjustified, and salaries based on students performance is a vogue idea and there are certain loopholes. primarily, for example, not every class is equal and every student is different. Teachers in university or a school taught hundreds of students and it is impossible to reach out every one of them and monitoring their progression. Besides not every student is equally attentive. Suppose there are thirty students and fifteen of them were not attentive in the class, so it was not teachers fault if they performed not up to the mark, and cut the salary of the teacher is not justified.
The second argument is that how can we examine the student's performance, the only possible answer is through subject knowledge test. But not every student equally attracted to subjects, some love math, and some love literature. So one might be performed good in mathematics and bad on physics and the same teachers taught them both subjects, then how can we determine the teacher performance. Another flip side of this statement is that, if a teacher not taught well but the majority of his or her students performed well then it would be abysmal for other teachers who work really hard and they might lose their concentration.
Many people argue that a student is a teacher responsibility and it is justified that students performance should be monitored by the teacher. It is true that a teacher's true success if a teacher can make a bright performance from a mediocre student. but it is not always possible, especially when teaches hundreds of students and tracking them is impossible. But a teacher duty is to guide his or students and give them the knowledge, not coddle them. it would be unfeasible if we held a teacher responsible for bad performance for a student.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that the implementation of the statement is unfeasible and it would be unreasonable if someone gets salaried for someone's performance. We get salary according to the quality and caliber. Also, that way a graduate qualified might get higher than a doctor qualified and there would be no values of a degree.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 50 | view |
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Men and women , because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speakers or reformer ever could 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e is unjustified, and salaries based on students performance is a vogue idea and there a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Primarily
...e idea and there are certain loopholes. primarily, for example, not every class is equal ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...argument is that how can we examine the students performance, the only possible answer i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...responsibility and it is justified that students performance should be monitored by the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...nitored by the teacher. It is true that a teachers true success if a teacher can make a br...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ht performance from a mediocre student. but it is not always possible, especially w...
^^^
Line 4, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ve them the knowledge, not coddle them. it would be unfeasible if we held a teache...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, if, really, second, so, then, well, for example, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94957983193 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99854612512 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47268907563 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2448245172 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.19047619 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170672235774 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592873025839 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416381642048 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102847218082 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345451846893 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.