In a number of countries, some people think that it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In this modern world, where population is increasing day by day and cities are been expanding at a great speed which affects the transportation problem if an employee is leaving far from his work place. Major chunk of people believe that government should invest more money on making high speed trains while other thinks that old public transportation should be renovated by that sum of money.
To embark on, it very vital to have convinent and safe transportation whether it is inter trip or intra trip. If the government spend huge amount of money for the construction of new railway tracks on which high speed trains can run then it would be beneficial for all. The dominant reason is, it will transport more number of passengers in very less time as these days people do not have much time to spend in communication between two places. Furthermore, these high speed trains would reduce the traffic rate on the road which is nowadays major issue in country like India. Moreover, these bullet train will also have good connectivity between two cities or states. Hence, if money is invested in a proper way than both political parties as well as public will have great benefits.
On the other hand, some people deem that rather than investing huge money on new tracks government should focus on existing road networks such as motorways, highways and also to improve facility of buses. The major advantage of a person travelling in bus and car is that they provide door to door service which bullet train cannot. So, these people have belief that government should give first priority to existing transportation system and than to new system.
In the end, it is important to divert money on those fields where people and nation can get enormous benefits. I believe that high speed trains will give fruitful results as they will cause less air pollution and will have safety and convinces to the passengers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- In a number of countries, some people think that it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public.Discuss both these v 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'interred'.
Suggestion: interred
...t and safe transportation whether it is inter trip or intra trip. If the government s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... or states. Hence, if money is invested in a proper way than both political parties as well as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... proper way than both political parties as well as public will have great benefits. On...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...y to existing transportation system and than to new system. In the end, it is im...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8773006135 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53182535662 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1356746478 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301647446268 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101306153396 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845059585669 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168296510763 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554550307572 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.