Some people believe that children should be given lessons on how to manage money in the school.
Do you agree or disagree.
It is thought by some that children ought to have money management lessons at school. In my opinion, schools should teach children to manage money as it helps them to understand the value of money and it will be beneficial for them and society in future.
A good reason to conduct money management classes is that it helps children to understand what money means in our life. Doing this, we can explain children that many things in the world have a certain price and people should have money in order to buy it. Moreover, children will know that money do not grow on the trees and people should study and work hardly in order to have a chance to earn them. As a result, they will study harder as they will now that study is the best contribution to their future life. In addition, children will not waste parent’s money as they will know that parents have to work to earn money.
Another point to consider is that money management lessons teach them how to control their income and expenditures. It will help them in future to save money and spend them on right things. Furthermore, children will understand that in future they should earn enough money to afford to buy properties and support their families. As a result, children will be highly motivated to succeed in life and earn more money and it will be beneficial for the society as well. As when people are rich and successful, they help to the economy to grow.
In conclusion, when children know how to manage money they can be successful in future and it will beneficial for whole society.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transportSummirise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced. 61
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours. 67
- Some people think that watching sport is a waste of leisure time.Do you agree or disagree. 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person In the United Kingdom, Sweden and Portugal between 1967 and 2007Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...will be beneficial for them and society in future. A good reason to conduct money manag...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: hardly work
...n the trees and people should study and work hardly in order to have a chance to earn them....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...em. As a result, they will study harder as they will now that study is the best co...
^^
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat parents have to work to earn money. Another point to consider is that money ...
^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ney management lessons teach them how to control their income and expenditures. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61151079137 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42261313395 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428057553957 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0373399483 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6153846154 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301837115063 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136127202085 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805024577629 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22668500214 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063935287039 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 78.4519038076 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.