The table below gives the result of two surveys, in 1997 and 2006, in which people were asked which communication skills were essential in their jobs
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of people who answered for two surveys happened in 1997 and 2006, in which people were asked which communication skills are necessary in their jobs.
Regarding external communication, when comparing between the two surveys, there was a remarkable point that the percentage of respondents asked for “Selling a product or service” decreased 6 percent from 1997 to 2006. Meanwhile, the remaining three elements all had a slight increase in the percentage of votes from 1997 to 2006.
About internal communication (within company), all of six factors, which were considered crucial in communication skills, rose slowly from 1997 to 2006. But two factors “Analysing problems together with others” and “Listening carefully to colleagues” went up from 38 percent to 47 percent in 2006.
In general, the percentage of respondents for both kinds of communications had rose from 1997 to 2006 except “Selling a product or service”. In addition, the most significant element that had a sharp rise in the percentage of respondents was “Listening carefully to colleagues”.
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parents are responsible for solving this problem.To what extent do you agree with this statement ? 61
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe that self-employment is better than work in a company or institution . Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- The table below gives the result of two surveys in 1997 and 2006 in which people were asked which communication skills were essential in their jobs Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The bar chart below gives information about the level of education of Bulgarian people who want to go and live in another country in 2002, 2006 and 2008Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71929824561 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67833932997 2.65546596893 139% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5346302883 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207678689567 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118387250966 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126818173593 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167479788696 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136951854521 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.