The pie charts compare the percentage of British pupils at a specific university who are bilingual or polyglot in two different time spans.
The pie charts compare the percentage of British pupils at a specific university who are bilingual or polyglot in two different time spans.
Overall, it is crystal clear that after a decade far more students could speak another language. While the percentage of learners who could speak French decreased moderately, other counterparts with the exception of German language faced a noticeable increase.
Looking at the graph in 2000, 20% of students could not speak any other languages, however, this proportion was halved in 2010. 15% and 10% of pupils spoke French and Germany in 2000, respectively. In 2010, nevertheless, the former figure went down, accounting for 10% and the latter remained static.
The percentage of students speaking Spanish was the highest in 2000 and 2010 and this proportion increased by 5% in 2010 to 35%. The percentage of bilingual students and pupils speaking other language have incremented by 5%, reaching 15% and 20% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-16 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 61 | view |
- It is true to say that normal people do not recycle their waste as far as possible. 73
- The illustration demonstrates the various stages undertaken in order to produce leather products. 78
- The bar chart compares various modes of daily commute including train, car, tube, and bus in three different time spans. 84
- The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British individuals donating part of their emolument to benevolent organizations in two different time span. 78
- The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ecreased moderately, other counterparts with the exception of German language faced a noticeable incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2987012987 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8746805318 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616883116883 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2017922204 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31028173204 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161639505585 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.318812202495 0.0843802449381 378% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295297055262 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.407428543847 0.0819641961636 497% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.